This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

AMD-Zen-Feature

Intel is experiencing a CPU shortage related to its delayed 10nm ramp, with total PC sales estimated to fall by as much as 7 percent this year according to JP Morgan. Information technology's a nasty blow to an industry that has endured multiple heavy hits in the past seven years equally consumer buying habits accept changed and overall PC sales have declined roughly 30 percent. But with Intel struggling to run into demand, there's a simple question to inquire that'south far more pertinent today than information technology would have been ii years ago: Can AMD motility to meet demand where Intel tin can't?

In 2022, this would've been a not-question. AMD had largely frozen its CPU development programme since 2022, with no architectural updates to its FX family and just modest improvements aimed more at improving CPU efficiency and power consumption than competing on raw functioning in mobile. Today, the situation is vastly different. Ryzen competes effectively with Intel in desktop PCs, Ryzen Mobile is ramping in laptops, and Epyc is winning attention from various server partners and some cloud providers. AMD is, in a discussion, competitive. And that means it should be able to buffer the market from some of the impact here.

Only exactly how much and where will plow on questions we don't know the answers to. If Intel's issue is related to its overall manufacturing chapters every bit opposed to being a yield trouble, the company volition likely prioritize its most valuable parts and sell the equipment it can manufacture nearly profitably. But there'south a lot we don't know. We don't know which factories are specifically having issues (Intel has said that it intends to upgrade Fab 28 for 10nm merely has said nothing about which fabs are having problems). And the PC market is divided amidst desktops (23.1 percent of the market), notebooks and mobile workstations (38.two percent), detachable tablets (5.2 pct), and slate tablets (33.5 percent). AMD competes in each of these spaces differently. It'due south strongest in desktops and notebooks, with relatively few plays in detachable systems and no slate systems or penetration in this market that I'm aware of.

The OEM Question

If AMD has a suitable drop-in part, how long should information technology take OEMs to roll out alternatives? Again, this is more easily answered in some markets than others. In cases where a visitor offers both an AMD and Intel version of a laptopSEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce
, it'll plainly exist easier to move towards promoting a SKU from ane vendor over the other. When an equivalent version of the same system doesn't be it can take time to create one. AMD'southward conclusion to innovate new college-power laptop chips at 45W before this calendar month could be read as the company quietly maneuvering to be in a improve position to take some business from Intel if the opportunity presents itself. If you don't take a office in a given toll or power band, after all, y'all aren't going to exist able to compete for it.

But the other major question to answer, and the one we really can't predict, is whether customers are themselves willing to accept AMD CPUs as a substitute for Intel. Once again, this is likely to vary by market. AMD's desktop play is currently potent, but we've seen few Ryzen Mobile gaming systems. Alienware and Origin PC have no AMD gaming laptops. HP'south Omen line has zero listed on its front page. In fact, it's startling just how bad the OEM promotions on AMD hardware really are. Acer showed a Nitro v with Ryzen Mobile at CES 2022, simply out of 15 Nitro 5 models offered for sale, only i is based on Ryzen.

Edit: Best Buy has a Nitro 5 from Acer with an RX 560 and Ryzen five CPU. So y'all can buy an AMD Ryzen Mobile organisation with a dGPU, albeit a low-end one.

HP has an entire webpage dedicated to AMD products, which looks great when yous first surf in. But check out the hardware that's actually in the systems:

Eight incredible options, ii actual choices, and i system that doesn't suck. Imagine if half-dozen of the 8 Intel machines HP showed y'all were based on Cantlet except for i bottom-finish Core i3 and one Cadre i5. And this is the AMD landing page at HP.

Of the eight systems listed, simply two are based on Ryzen at all. There are no Ryzen Mobile systems. There are no second-generation Ryzen systems. If you click on the "View all AMD powered laptops" the first laptops you meet are the aforementioned Carrizo-based minimum spec systems AMD was selling earlier Ryzen Mobile hitting the market place. In that location are no Ryzen 7 SKUs offered past default and few-to-no discrete GPU options for the Ryzen Mobile systems you can purchase. Dell has more high-end Ryzen SKUs, only a similar deficit of dGPU offerings.

Before AMD can exist a suitable replacement for Intel, people have to exist able to buy machines. If OEMs don't build them, consumers obviously aren't going to buy them. Which brings united states of america to the next question — how many people call back AMD and Intel are dorsum in competitive standing again and are willing to look to AMD for their side by side builds in the first place?

Are Consumers Willing to Substitute?

I genuinely don't know the reply to this question. Nosotros tin can assume that for the average buyer, the question of CPU manufacturer may not be especially of import, but what about enthusiasts and gamers? We know that AMD's CPUSEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce sales have skyrocketed since Ryzen and that the company has gained significant amounts of retail channel market share. But desktops are a distinct minority of the overall market — retrieve, nosotros're evaluating whether AMD can drop in and supersede Intel in systems every bit a whole, and fifty-fifty if we ignore slates, AMD needs a competitive mobile solution to actually do good from whatever unmet larger demand. Right now, nobody is building loftier-end Ryzen Mobile systems to compete with the higher-end gaming laptops you can buy with Intel hardware, which means this ultimately comes down to an untestable hypothesis.

If there's a reason to exist uncertain here, it's this: AMD's mobile SoCs devote significantly more die space and thermal budget to their integrated GPUs than IntelSEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce does. This pays big dividends when comparing integrated graphics, just when considering mobile parts it means AMD is edifice more GPU into the SoC than it might technically need when you consider that these systems would be paired with discrete Nvidia solutions (AMD has its own Mobile Vega, but when nosotros'll see those systems is anyone's gauge).

Right now, the question of whether consumers are willing to substitute is finer unanswerable, because AMD has and then little presence in these markets. The visitor just started aircraft 45W chips, so we'll have to await and see on this one. But we can't even examine the question of whether Ryzen Mobile can compete with the Core i3/i5/i7 in mobile gaming with a detached GPU.

The best conclusion we can reach is this: You can buy a number of Ryzen Mobile systems in the $500 to $1,000 range, merely none specifically intended for gaming and only a few products that'd reasonably be called loftier-end outside of that marketplace. In the $500 to $750 range buyers may not intendance which CPU they use, but in that location'southward fiddling fashion for higher-stop users to even compare AMD and Intel functioning, which means these buyers can't substitute unless machines actually go available.

Foundry Capacity and Production Mix

The final piece to the puzzle is whether GlobalFoundries has the capacity to allocate to AMD for a major ramp of mobile products or a pivot to address this market place in the outset place. Again, there are a lot more questions than answers here. AMD has to be 1 of GF's largest 12/14 customers, but GF is in the middle of pivoting abroad from 7nm and towards its own FDX strategy, which could impact its ain 12/14 availability going frontward and in the longer term.  AMD presumably has some flexibility here, both on which parts information technology builds and how many wafers it orders, simply we'd need more information to suss out the trends.

When you put the pieces together, the big-picture takeaway is this: AMD is watching the evolving situation with Intel with corking interest — guarantee it — and an heart towards where it might gain marketplace share. The question of where and how it could have an opportunity to do so is complex and touches on more than than whether AMD has competitive silicon in-market. Information technology'll be impacted by whether OEMs motility to launch more AMD systems in some markets and how aggressively they try and shift consumers to other systems, as well as by whether AMD tin pick up some SKUs in areas where it currently seems to have no real market presence, like the high end of the laptop market. It'll too be impacted by GF's foundry plans and AMD'south flexibility on wafers and wafer pricing.

In other words: Even in a all-time-instance scenario for AMD, it'll probably be Q4 before we see whatsoever touch on, and the size of the gain will depend on whether AMD has equivalent parts to match against Intel in the specific areas where Intel is falling curt. And, of grade, it'll be impacted by just how severe the Intel supply constraint is and how long information technology lasts. With component prices going up cheers to tariffs, OEMs aren't necessarily in a neat place to absorb additional shocks from scarce CPUs.

Now Read: AMD Lists New, College-Power Mobile Ryzen CPUs, Intel CPU Shortages Hit Whiskey Lake, and GlobalFoundries Radically Restructures, Kills 7nm